1. Этот сайт использует файлы cookie. Продолжая пользоваться данным сайтом, Вы соглашаетесь на использование нами Ваших файлов cookie. Узнать больше.
Скрыть объявление
Немецкие анализы на боррелиоз и сопутствующие инфекции

В России появилась возможность выполнять лабораторные анализы на боррелиоз и ко-инфекции в немецкой лаборатории ArminLabs

Подробнее...

Видео Science that heals

Тема в разделе "Видео", создана пользователем Julia Göteborg, 10 авг 2015.

  1. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........
    Professor Luc Montagnier graduated in both Medicine and Biological Sciences at the University of Paris. At the age of 23, he became Assistant at this University. After a fruitful post-doctoral stay in two British laboratories, Montagnier spent most of his scientific carrier in two renowned French Institutions, the Institut Curie and for almost 30 years at the Institut Pasteur in Paris. Within the new Department of Virology of the latter Institute, he founded the Viral Oncology Research Unit. This laboratory devoted its activities to the study of cancer viruses, mostly the oncogenic retroviruses. Montagnier also studied the biochemical mechanisms which are at the origin of the growth in soft agar of virus transformed cultured cells, and evidenced the multi-step transformation of these cells based on their particular properties of growth in soft gels. In addition, his laboratory was involved in the discovery of interferon messenger RNA, opening the way for the cloning of the interferon genes and also showed the important role of interferon in the expression of retroviruses, including endogenous retroviruses.

    In 1983, Montagnier led the team which first isolated the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV1), a new type of retrovirus previously unrecognized in humans and brought the first evidence that this virus was the causative agent of AIDS. In 1985, he also isolated the second AIDS virus, HIV2, from West African patients. Montagnier’s laboratory was also the first to show that a large percentage of white blood cells of HIV infected patients were prone to die by apoptosis, a process of programmed cell death and to attribute its origin to the oxidative stress occurring in the patients, possibly associated with co-infections.

    Besides his involvement in the design of new types of HIV vaccines, Montagnier’s current studies are aiming at the diagnosis and treatment of microbial, viral, and epigenetic factors associated with cancers, neurodegenerative and articular diseases, using innovative technologies. A strong advocate of preventive medicine, Montagnier is especially concerned with prolonging the active life of aging people.

    Beyond his scientific interest is his deep commitment to helping developing countries acquire knowledge of and access to modern medicine and preventive medicine. As President of the World Foundation for Aids Research and Prevention, Montagnier has co-founded two Centers for the prevention, treatment, research and diagnosis of AIDS patients in the Ivory Coast and Cameroon.

    Since 2005, as President-CEO and co-founder of Nanectis Biotechnologies SA, Paris, Montagnier developed a new biophysical technology detecting electromagnetic waves in the plasma of patients suffering from chronic degenerative diseases. These waves are induced in water dilutions by some DNA sequences, presumably originating from pathogenic bacteria and viruses. In the case of HIV infection, Montagnier showed that this technology can detect HIV DNA in patients treated by antiretroviral therapy and having no detectable virus load in the blood. This seminal discovery is opening the way to design new treatments aimed at functionally eradicating HIV infection.

    Luc Montagnier has been honored worldwide with many awards, including the Rosen (1971), Gallien (1985), Korber (1986), and Jeantet (1986) Prizes, the Lasker Prize in Medicine (1986), the Gairdner Prize (1987), Sante Prize (1987), Japan Prize (1988), King Faisal Prize (1993), Amsterdam Foundation Prize (1994), Warren Alpert Prize (1998), Prince of Asturias Award (2000), the induction to the National Inventor Hall of Fame (2004). Montagnier is Commandeur de l’Ordre National du Merite (1986) and Grand Officier of the Legion of Honour (2009).

    In 2008, Montagnier was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physiology and Medicine, for his discovery of HIV, together with Francoise Barre-Sinoussi.
    Professor Montagnier is the author or co-author of 350 scientific publications and of more than 750 patents.
    http://montagnier.org/-Luc-Montagnier-Biography-

    LUC MONTAGNIER: SCIENCE THAT HEALS (120 years of life and the promise of preventive medicine)

     
  2. Niko
    Оффлайн

    Niko Почетный форумчанин

    Сообщения:
    3.177
    Симпатии:
    3.827
    Откуда:
    ...
  3. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........

    Science is full of stories where new discoveries and new emerging concepts are at first badly received by a community of conservative scientists ; the only fault to the first proponents is to have been too far in advance. I believe this is happening again to me and it is very sad that it involves Nobel Prizes laureates attacking a fellow Nobel Prize laureate.


    It reminds me of the year 1983 and first quarter of 1984, a time where we were only ten in the world to believe we had isolated the main cause of AIDS and we were strongly criticized by Robert Gallo and his supporters, including some distinguished colleagues of the Pasteur Institute. Of course the confirmation by Gallo and Levy came afterwards, but this scientific dispute led to a one year delay for the detection of the lethal virus in blood used for transfusions, a year delay which tragically allowed the deterioration and deaths of thousands of HIV sufferers.

    Now we are facing a still greater medical issue.

    AIDS and Chronic Diseases

    AIDS is still a major problem worldwide and demands top quality research, not only in developed countries, but in Africa where it is a continent-wide scourge.

    This is why, in 1993, I created and cofounded with Federico Mayor - then Director General of UNESCO - the World Foundation for AIDS Research and Prevention. One of its main objectives was to set up Research Centers in developing countries, especially in Africa where AIDS was fast spreading.

    A first Center (CIRBA) was created in 1996 in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, with the help of the Ivorian Government. Today, 3.000 ambulatory patients per year are treated with ARVS in the Center and some of them are enrolled in clinical trials, upon agreement of the National Ethical Committee and under my supervision. The Center also participates actively in research launched by other Institutions.

    A second Center (CIRCB) was created in 2006 in Yaoundé, under the aegis of the First Lady of Cameroon, Mrs. Chantal Biya, with financial participation of the Italian Government. Its main objective was to better control the transmission of HIV from mother to child, a problem which has disappeared in developed countries because of the prenatal ARV treatment of the mother, but is still recurrent in African countries because many pregnant mothers are not tested and the early detection of the child infection is often not possible.

    I was the Chairman of the Scientific Council and Vice-Chairman of the Managing Committee of the Center. Pr. Vittorio Colizzi, from the Tor Vergata University in Rome, was appointed as the First Scientific Director and then as interim Scientific Director. Pr. Colizzi had a project of HIV vaccine : since some HIV infections occur in infants after birth by breast feeding, he proposed to prevent this infection by vaccination of newborns by HIV peptides HLA compatible, boosted by BCG, as strong adjuvant of cellular immunity.

    Vaccination by B.C.G. against Tuberculosis has been given up in industrialized countries for its lack of efficacy but is still operative in some African Countries. BCG is no longer made by the Pasteur Institute, but is still produced in Bulgaria.

    At the beginning, the research part of the project (study of the HLA/peptide matching in African individuals) was included in a more general project dealing with mother protection of HIV infection (Families First Africa) and supported by funds distributed by UNESCO and my Foundation.

    However UNESCO did not accept to be involved in the part of the project related to clinical trials as being more of the domain of WHO. Meanwhile, the advent of ARVs in Africa, with the help of the Global Fund and other International Institutions, permitted the decrease of the transmission of HIV to newborns almost to zero in some parts of Cameroon, making the Colizzi project less necessary.

    In 2010, the board of our Foundation decided to drop any further participation in this project, in view of its costs and of its likely inability to be accepted by any ethical Committee and WHO. BCG diffusion (generalized BCGite) could not be excluded in babies with an immature immune system and insufficiently protected by antibodies of the mother (we had evidence in France of a death by BCGite of an infant born to a seropositive mother, the latter having no sign of advanced immune depression).

    Pr. Colizzi has decided to continue his project, despite its uncertain future.

    Professor Colizzi’s contract as Interim Scientific Director ended in 2011 (he was given an extension of 4 months). During the last year of his interim Directorship, Pr. Colizzi was engaged in an ongoing managerial conflict with both the Administrative Manager of the Center (Dr. Fouda), and the Chairman of the Managing Committee (Mr Jean-Stéphane Biatcha). Prof Colizzi appealed to Richard Roberts (Nobel Laureate in Physiology or Medecine) to intervene on his behalf with the President of Cameroun, Mr Paul Biya. I myself tried to moderate the terms of an aggressive letter written by Dr Roberts to President Biya (enclosed letter).


    The new Statutes of CIRCB


    It was agreed by most members of the Managing Committee, by its President, Mr Biatcha, and its Vice-president, myself, that it was important for the CIRCB to follow the usual model of Research Institutes by giving the leadership to a General Director, who should be a scientist and not an Administrative manager.

    In a session held in the Spring, 2012, a new project of statutes was accepted by the Managing Committee, then accepted by the Services of the Prime Minister with minor modifications and finally promulgated by President Paul Biya by Decree of May 31, 2012. Meanwhile, I accepted the proposal by the Managing Committee to be the Interim Scientific Director, the position left vacant by the departure of Colizzi. I received an email from R. Roberts commenting favorably on my increased involvement in the Center. With the agreement of Mr. Biatcha, and according to the new Statutes, I notified the present Members of the Scientific Committee of the end of their mandate, thanking them for their valued and competent contribution.

    I also informed our scientific personnel that they could continue their research projects, in particular the detection of HIV infection in newborns and the fast detection of resistance mutations. Also, new projects will be started under my direction, such as the identification of the viral reservoir resistant to ARVs, a key project whose achievement could permit the eradication of HIV infection. An important project, already accepted by the former Scientific Council, was to create a core facility for clinical trials inside or near the Center.

    The use by some members of the Scientific Council, of the allegations made by S. Salzberg in the e-blog of a US based magazine

    My studies on the role of microbial infections in chronic diseases led me, in 2010, to search for a coherent organic origin of autism. The hypothesis is not new that abnormal passage of bacterial products from the gut to the blood circulation and from the blood to the brain could affect the maturation of neurones in children. But I was able to confirm, by a new technology (see below) and also by the clinical experience of my physician colleagues, the validity of this hypothesis. This led me to propose highly regulated courses of appropriate antibiotics, administered with antifungal and antioxidant treatments for improving the condition of young autistic children. Several clinical trials were proposed and submitted to ad hoc ethical committees. Finally, under the aegis of the French Ministry of Health, a double blind trial with placebo will be set up in several centers in France to verify our anecdotal results already obtained in more than 200 children. I realize the multifactorial complexity of autism but the suppression of latent microbial infections may be key for improving this condition and eventually leading to a cure of many autistic children.

    It is within this spirit that I responded positively to the invitation of a U.S. association of parents of autistic children, AutismOne, in Chicago, in May 2012. In my talk, I described the results obtained in Europe by the above mentioned antibiotic treatment, and the new technology for detection of bacterial DNA in the blood, and our physio-pathogenic explanation. Among the possible multifactorial origins of autism, I never cite vaccinations. Yet, a Forbes journalist entitled his article : “French Nobelist joins the anti-vaccination crowd”.

    My position on vaccines has not changed over the last 30 years : the principle has proved to be excellent in the past. Smallpox has been eradicated in the world thanks to the use of vaccination, with attenuated vaccinia virus. But some had to pay a horrific price : encephalitis in a certain number of children. Over the years, vaccinations against bacteria and viruses have multiplied, appearing as the most cost-effective way to prevent epidemics. However, side effects are becoming more important and a single death cannot be tolerated any longer. Many parents have observed a temporal association - which does not mean causation - between a vaccination by puncture and the appearance of autism symptoms. This should not be neglected by the medical community and public health decision makers. It is therefore of prime importance to study the risk factors, both environmental and genetic, which could be involved in order to prevent them. Presumably, vaccination, especially vaccination against multiple antigens, could be a trigger of a pre-existing pathological situation in some children.

    The vaccine denialists are not the courageous individuals who raise the problems of vaccination accidents, but are those people who deny the existence of these tragic accidents. The latter believe in the dogma “vaccines are good”, period. They are forgetting the Hippocratic oath : primum, non nocere. First, do no harm.

    In the particular case of HIV vaccination, several candidates have failed to show efficacy and I posit why : the existence of HIV transmissible forms, invisible to the immune system. Without the identification of these forms and their inclusion in vaccine, no sufficient level of protection could be expected.

    With the likely impossibility of an HIV vaccine, a very serious problem arises for the control of AIDS epidemic worldwide : the inclusion of a large number of African patients, and the necessity to maintain their ARV treatment for the rest of their lives, make almost unavoidable the emergence and diffusion of resistant viral strains. The consequences are limited in industrialized countries, in which the HIV prevalence is 0.1 %, and where second or third line expensive viral inhibitors can be utilized. In African countries, where HIV prevalence varies between 5 % to 20 % or more, the application of these new inhibitors will be economically unsustainable.

    Therefore it is of prime importance to find an alternative solution : to identify the viral reservoir which remains insensitive to viral inhibitors and to decrease the size of this reservoir by appropriate complementary treatments, so that virus multiplication will not resume after a limited treatment of ARV.

    This is why I would like to engage our African Research Centers in this new direction, and to link them to the multiple collaborations we have already set up in a number of African countries : I hope that CIRCB can contribute to this goal – ultimately AIDS free Africa - benefiting from our ongoing research.

    New tools, new concepts and attacks ad hominem

    It is generally recognized that Nobel laureates are less productive in science in their “post Nobel” life. There are a few exceptions ; I am trying to be one of these.

    At the end of my carrier at the Pasteur Institute (2000), I came across a phenomenon difficult to explain by our current knowledge. Filtration by commercial filters is a well accepted method to sterilize biological solutions which cannot stand sterilization by heat ; for instance, serums for cell culture are filtrated by 200 nM filters to remove any mycoplasma contamination. I discovered that such filtrates - considered sterile by lack of growth in cell-free medium and lack of DNA by PCR – would still generate the original mycoplasma organism when incubated with human lymphocytes.

    This result – repeated more than 100 times – led me to investigate the properties of the main constituent of the filtrate : water, in particular by applying the technologies already used by the collaborators of the late Jacques Benveniste. In 2005, in our laboratory that I was leasing at the Institut Armand Frappier of Laval (Canada), an astonishing phenomenon appeared to us : by capturing electromagnetic signals from aqueous dilutions of biological molecules, I could see for the first time a significant increase of their amplitude over the background noise, but only in some dilutions. Benveniste’s preparations never showed a visible increase of signal amplitude whatever the dilutions. This was July 13, 2005. My collaborator and I were enthusiastic.

    Use of Fourier transforms indicated soon afterwards that there were new frequencies emitted by resonance in the range of 1000-3000 Hertz appearing over the noise.

    Very soon also we could extend this observation to many preparations of bacteria, viruses and patients’ plasmas. Initial filtration and then strong vortex shaking between dilutions were absolutely necessary to observe the phenomenon.

    A few months later, we identified the source of the signals : it was some specific DNA sequences, which are different from one microorganism to another.

    By studying cohorts, we could also associate the presence of this particular DNA with some chronic diseases : Alzheimer, Parkinson, Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Autism and HIV infection.

    In the case of HIV, we had two surprises : the signals coming mostly from the LTR region of HIV DNA were more intense in the plasma of patients treated by ARVs and not having detectable virus load (RNA) in their blood. Moreover, viral DNA and the signals were also associated with the red blood cell fraction.

    Are we dealing with an HIV reservoir, which accumulates under antiretroviral therapy ?

    Time came for publishing these results. But in which journal ? The experimental work was touching so many different disciplines, from quantum physics to virology and immunology, that I doubted whether any peer-reviewer could draw a global evaluation.

    Even as of today, the persisting negative reaction of some Nobel Laureates indicates a lack of understanding of new scientific facts and a refusal to admit the existence of something they do not understand : “I just do not believe it !”, they say. This is not a scientific attitude.

    Finally, I choose to publish the first two papers in a new interdisciplinary journal – “Interdisciplinary Sciences“- founded in Shanghai by a colleague, Professor Dongqing Wei, who was not afraid to publish intriguing new data.

    As is generally accepted, as Chairman of the Editorial Board of a new journal, I was asked by the Editor-in-Chief, Dongqing Wei, to contribute papers for its launching. My two papers were quickly published. These papers were the two most cited in the first two years of the journal.

    This was not a unique situation encountered in my career. In 1963, I published in “Nature” with Kingsley Sanders the first evidence of a double -stranded RNA in the replication of a single stranded RNA virus. The paper was immediately accepted after its submission to “Nature” and I received the galley proofs within two weeks.


    DNA transduction by water nanostructure and EMS

    Since the beginning of my work in this new field, I was concerned by two issues :

    • Can water structures formed by EMS carry the genetic information of the original DNA ?
    • In order for a discovery to be accepted by the scientific community, it has to be reproduced by independent laboratories.
    As of today, we have positive answers for both of those questions.

    I presented for the first time at the Nobel Conference in Lindau, in June 2010, the first evidence of accurate transmission by waves of a DNA sequence, the LTR fragment of HIV, through formation of nanostructures in water.

    This was described in more detail and more theoretical elaboration by physicist colleagues in the Journal of Physics in a peer-reviewed article (L MONTAGNIER, J AISSA, E DEL GIUDICE, C LAVALLEE, A TEDESCHI and G VITIELLO. 2011.
    DNA waves and water. J. Phys. : Conference Series Volume 306 Number 1. 012007).

    My presentation in Lindau was an attempt to pay a sort of homage to the Nobel Institution while giving to my colleague laureates and to the students also invited at this Conference some flavor of ongoing provocative scientific research.

    Since then, we have gone even farther, by showing transmission to a remote laboratory via internet of the digitalized record of the signal emitted by a particular DNA sequence ; the receiving laboratory was able to reconstitute the exact DNA sequence (ranging from a 104 base pair fragment to a 499 base pair fragment) from the water instructed by the magnetic component of the signal, by using the ingredients necessary to synthesize DNA by PCR.
    This eliminates any criticism of contamination, since the emitter laboratory (in Paris) was distantly located and had no physical contact with the receiver laboratories (one in Germany, one in Italy) !
    A US laboratory reports similar results.


    I realize how audacious, and even shocking, these successful experiments may appear to unprepared minds. But, as Louis Pasteur used to say, “Fortune smiles on prepared minds“.

    This, of course, raises many questions to be resolved, such as :

    • Do the nanostructures circulating in the blood play a role in the pathogeny of diseases ?
    • How a TAQ DNA polymerase can read a DNA sequence on a water nanostructure stable for hours and days ?
    • Are all DNA polymerases able to possess this skill ?
    • Is it a general phenomenon existing from the origin of life ?
    • Are other DNA sequences, including those of the human genome, also able to emit EMS under certain conditions ? If so, what role are they playing in the ontogeny and phylogeny of living organisms ?
    I am urging my scientific and medical colleagues - and in particular the Nobel laureates - to participate in this inspiring adventure, instead of being negative and fueling a rear-guard combat.

    Luc Montagnier

    http://montagnier.org/HIV-Autism-Vaccines
     
    Последнее редактирование: 12 авг 2015
  4. Niko
    Оффлайн

    Niko Почетный форумчанин

    Сообщения:
    3.177
    Симпатии:
    3.827
    Откуда:
    ...
  5. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........
    На все эти вопросы в видео есть подробнейшие ответы. )))
    Ничего-ничего, за "круглую Землю" тоже травили, мучали и сжигали, а она все равно оказалась круглой.:p
    Таких прецедентов было тысячи за историю.
    "Люди - необучаемые идиоты" - один очень умный человек. :)
    Все новое всегда так проростало...
     
  6. Niko
    Оффлайн

    Niko Почетный форумчанин

    Сообщения:
    3.177
    Симпатии:
    3.827
    Откуда:
    ...
    Юль ну это как то не серьезно ответ на это вопрос это несколько подробных отчетов не зависимых лаборатории с описанием этого эксперимента такая революционная тема и ни кто даже не опробовал повторить это революционное открытие вас саму то это не смущает.

    Не серьезно в видео сплошные общие слова ни какого критического взгляда так реклама и ответа на вопросы там нету:))

    Потенциально эти исследование могут привести к революции не то что в медицине а вообще в способе передачи и хранении информации где ж движуха вокруг этой темы где крупные фонды толкающиеся чтоб про инвестировать в исследования?

    прошло 4 года с момента публикации и работу не то что осуждают ее ни кто не обсуждает?)
     
  7. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........
    Да Вы троллите меня, или? :unsure:
    Вы читали, Вы смотрели?! Вот это что означает?:
    А вот о способе передачи информации - это да...:confused: Об этом попозже.
    Может потому и глухо :unsure:
     
  8. Niko
    Оффлайн

    Niko Почетный форумчанин

    Сообщения:
    3.177
    Симпатии:
    3.827
    Откуда:
    ...
    Я вас не троллю юль мне это не интересно я пытаюсь вас понять мне честно есть чем занятся по мимо форума. Просто мне вас интересно читать вы делитесь интересными статьями но последние время я вас плохо понимаю и некоторые ваши идей мне чужды вот я пытаюсь понять почему так:)
    Не очень понимаю в чем ваши сомнения все что вы привели я прочитал и посмотрел благо сегодня была возможность потратить на это время честно удовольствие от этого не получил но нашел вот такую интересную статью https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140122-a-new-physics-theory-of-life/ к теме прямого отношения не имеет но мне было интересно))
     
  9. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........
    Cлушайте, Вы меня пугаете:unsure: Чё, действительно..? Ну хотя бы название этой темы прочитайте...
    Что Вы видите? :unsure:
    Но я не ради удовольствия подала это видео... Хотя о новых подходах к лечению можно получить удовольствие, думаю. Но это, конечно, если есть желание воспринимать и менять сознание...
    Теорий происхождения жизни море, не только эта.
     
  10. Niko
    Оффлайн

    Niko Почетный форумчанин

    Сообщения:
    3.177
    Симпатии:
    3.827
    Откуда:
    ...
    Там не совсем о теории жизни там предложено обяснение почему отдельные атомы стали обьединятся в живые формы и почему возникла жизьн в частности речь идет о том что таким образом образуя живые организмы атомы смогли получать больше энергии. Таким образом если эта теория получит подтверждение и все жизненые формы обьединаются по этому принцепу то тогда при создание мат аппарата можно будет прогнозировать где теоретический есть жизьн и какая она должна быть. А так же можно будет предсказывать возможные изменения для жизниных форм под воздействием окружающей среды. Как следствие можно будет предсказывать возникновение патологических состоянии для здоровья.
    По крайне мере я это себе так понял:)

    Что касается монтенье и его видео идея с антиоксидантным стрессом и ролли бактерии в возникновении болезнии то эти идей отнюдь не революционны в наше время. Из нового тока идей для нового типа тест систем но как то очень мало конкретики так общие зарисовки и основной вопрос обнаружение днк всегда ли это говорит о наличии активной инфекции особенно таким способом. Мне не совсем понятно на сколько релевантно обнаружит в 8-9 дистеляте днк патогена какая там корреляция с реальной инфекции. Здорово конечно что он смог что то общие обнаружить у больных но где ж контрольная группа из здоровых?

    Хз помоему новые знания особенно если они имеют практическое применение это всегда удовольствие.:)
     
    Olena нравится это.
  11. Julia Göteborg
    Оффлайн

    Julia Göteborg Ветеран форума

    Сообщения:
    6.124
    Симпатии:
    4.388
    Откуда:
    ........
    Телепортация уже проведена несколько раз в разные страны.
    Согласна, смотря в какие руки попадет. А ведь попадет же...:confused:
    Я об этом и хотела поговорить позже. Но раз уж сейчас, то сначала:

    Нобелевский лауреат Люк Монтанье подтвердил наши исследования
    Уж если пытаться что-то говорить в этой области, то не на таком уровне. Основа этого материала - исследование группы нобелиата 2008г. (за открытие ВИЧ) - Люка Монтенье, а дальше беспочвенные фантазии.
    Комментарий к статье http://www.mk.ru/science/article/20...sti.html&&&?action=comments&&?action=comments или - как Нобелевский лауреат Люк Монтанье подтвердил наши исследования

    Уж если пытаться что-то говорить в этой области, то не на таком уровне. Основа этого материала - исследование группы нобелиата 2008г. (за открытие ВИЧ) - Люка Монтенье, а дальше беспочвенные фантазии. Люк Монтенье действительно вторгся в область Лингвистико-Волновой Генетики (ЛВГ) – направления в науке, начатого Русскими биологами Гурвичем, Любищевым и Беклемишевым в 20-х – 4-х годах прошлого века. Но в ЛВГ Люк Монтенье ориентируется, прямо скажем, слабо. Да и сама ЛВГ - объект постоянного шельмования со стороны т.н. официальной науки. Причин для этого множество - а) надо делиться деньгами, когда все уже "распилено", б) надо менять парадигму генетики, а неохота, присиделись, принюхались, денежка капает - и ладно. Вон, программа Геном Человека скушала миллиарды, а результат смешной - по генам мы ничем не отличаемся от свиней, обезьян и даже бактерий. Да и генов-то оказалось у нас около 2% от всей ДНК, а 98% - мусор, или остатки вирусных геномов... (абсолютно не логично), в) фармакологи ЛВГ просто не приемлют по понятным причинам, г), д), е) и т.д.

    Почему принципиально важно исследование нобелиата Люка Монтенье (и наши, в существенно более продвинутом варианте) по электромагнитной трансляции ДНК в структуру воды, в том числе и в структуру внутриклеточной воды?

    В медицине, как ни странно звучит, сложилась критическая ситуация в смысле неиспользования огромных реальных возможностей. Причина – многолетнее и продолжающееся непонимание стратегических принципов работы главного информационного центра человека – его генетического аппарата, который отвечает не только за наследственность, но осуществляет ключевую регуляцию обмена веществ, вплоть до уровня мышления и сознания. Главная проблема – в непонимание, игнорирование противоречия в Модели Генетического Года (МГК) нобелиатов - М.Ниренберга и Ф.Крика. Фактически, это грубая ошибка – не осознавать, точнее, игнорировать значение неоднозначности кодирования аминокислот белковым кодом. Эта неоднозначность была сразу же отмечена, но не объяснена, М.Ниренбергом и Ф.Криком http://www.ebiblioteka.lt/resursai/Uzsienio leidiniai/Uspechi_Fiz_Nauk/1964/1/r641c.pdf,

    лауреата Нобелевской премии 2008 года Люка Монтенье «DNA waves and water» http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1012/1012.5166v1.pdf Она вызвала громкий отклик в научном мире, поскольку содержит экспериментальное доказательство дистантной (дальней) волновой передачи структуры молекулы ДНК непосредственно в воду. Группа Л.Монтенье 03.02.2011г. получила патент США на технологию детектирования фантомных реплик ДНК в воде http://www.freepatentsonline.com/20110027774.pdf Он в какой-то мере аналогичен нашему патенту – Роспатент, 2009г., №2355009 «Способ и устройство получения волновых репликативных отображений ДНК». Заявка №2007102044. Приоритет изобретения 22 января 2007 г. К сожалению, авторы не ссылаются на наши, указанные выше, публикации 2003 года и другие, а также на наш патент, где мы уже доказали то же самое в отношении волновых реплик ДНК. А также продемонстрировали дистантую волновую трансляцию генетической информации и получили патент на эту технологию – Роспатент, 2010г., «Способ и устройство управляемого волнового воздействия на клеща Варроа». Заявка №2008134520. Приоритет изобретения 26 августа 2008 г., http://www.wavegenetics.jino-net.ru/zip/Diabet.zip . Кроме того, мы продемонстрировали экспериментальный волновой иммунитет у животных http://www.wavegenetics.jino-net.ru/zip/Wimmuni.zip. Мы дали теоретическую интерпретацию не только нашим экспериментам, но и указанной работе группы Люка Монтенье http://scireprints.lu.lv/160/1/gariaev.pitkanen.pdf , где авторы дали недостаточное теоретическое объяснения, ими же полученных результатов. Теперь, после независимого подтверждения командой Люка Монтенье главного, что мы уже доказали – факта дальней передачи работающей генетической информации волновым путем, наступает новая эра в биологии, генетике и медицине. Открываются реальные возможности управлять здоровьем и продлять жизнь людей, используя лингвистико-квантовые атрибуты хромосом, о чем мы говорили и публиковали работы на протяжении последних 25 лет. Добавлю важное - уже около 20 лет назад наш замечательный физик-кристаллограф, Николай Александрович Бульонков, доказал, что структура воды способна создавать кластеры, из которых можно выстроить «водные аналоги, копии» ДНК, РНК и белков. Вот где главная информация для группы Люка Монтенье и для нас, подводящая реальную основу для его и нашей работы.

    Возникает естественный вопрос – а что же может ЛВГ в практическом плане? Перечислю то, что уже получено применительно к больным людям, хотя это единичные случаи:

    1. Регенерация зубов,
    2. Регенерация части прямой кишки,
    3. Регенерация волос,
    4. Восстановление утраченного зрения,
    5. Постепенное излечивание от синдрома Шарко-Мари,
    6. Одновременная нормализация состояния большой группы людей,
    7. Быстрое и полное восстановление после кровоизлияния в мозг и наступившего паралича,
    8. Излечение от рака кости и рака молочной железы,
    9. Антидиабетные эффекты,
    10. Первичные признаки торможения старения.
    И другие данные, которые накапливаются и систематизируются. Замечу также, что потенциальное применение ЛВГ существенно шире.

    Доктор биологических наук,
    Академик Российской Академии Естественных Наук,
    Академик Российской Академии Медико-Технических Наук,
    Член Нью-Йоркской Академии Наук,
    Председатель правления НП «Новая биология 21 века»
    Гаряев П.П.
    http://www.wavegenetic.ru/14-nobelevskiy-laureat-lyuk-montane-podtverdil-nashi-issledovaniya.html

    Ну, короче, что говорить - спасем всех или спасайся, кто может.:nailbiting:
     
    Olena нравится это.
Загрузка...
Похожие темы на форуме : -
  1. Niko
    Ответов:
    29
    Просмотров:
    948

Поделиться этой страницей